U.S. Seems Unlikely to Accept That Rights Treaty Applies to Its Actions Abroad, Charles Savage, New York Times, March 6, 2014
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Friday, March 7, 2014
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Democracy, Human Rights, and Intelligence Sharing
"In this Article, the author explores the networks used by intelligence agencies to share intelligence and conduct joint operations with foreign counterparts worldwide. Understanding how these intelligence networks operate, the author argues, is imperative both for effective intelligence gathering and for a democratic society. Characterized by secrecy, flexibility, and informality, intelligence sharing networks are constrained almost exclusively by a shared professional ethos, rather than law. According to the author, such an ethos can exert some degree of accountability to professional norms, but has been strained by the inclusion of less professional and often ruthless intelligence services in the network. Nonetheless, all such networks pose serious threat to the preservation of liberal democracies in that they essentially govern themselves. The very concept of democracy demands that an intelligence agency be held accountable to a democratic body or officials outside of the agency itself. Yet, as this Article shows, few democratically elected officials are aware of intelligence sharing; and virtually no mechanism, other than self-regulation, provides oversight or accountability for any intelligence agency’s transnational activities. As a result, through their network ties, intelligence agencies that are expected to serve democratic interests have undermined foreign policy and circumvented safeguards established by domestic law and international treaties. The author argues that this serious gap in the rule of law must be filled and posits ways to render intelligence agencies more accountable to the democracies they purport to serve."
Democracy, Human Rights, and Intelligence Sharing, Elizabeth Sepper, Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 46, 151-207 (2010)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Labels
- accountability (1)
- Allende (1)
- black bag operations (1)
- Central Intelligence Agency (14)
- Chile (1)
- CIA (17)
- civil liberties (1)
- code of conduct (1)
- covert action (1)
- diplomacy (1)
- diplomatic cover (1)
- domestic intelligence (1)
- drones (1)
- drug experiments (1)
- economic espionage (2)
- economic intelligence (1)
- embassies (1)
- encryption (2)
- enhanced interrogation methods (4)
- espionage (3)
- ethical standards (2)
- FISA (3)
- FISA Court (2)
- FOIA (1)
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (1)
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (4)
- Freedom of Information Act (2)
- GCHQ (2)
- Government Communications Headquarters (1)
- human intelligence (1)
- human rights (2)
- HUMINT (3)
- intelligence sharing (1)
- interrogation (3)
- Iran (1)
- Japan (1)
- Middle East (1)
- military intelligence (1)
- Mossadegh (1)
- National Security Agency (16)
- National Security Council (1)
- NSA (17)
- NYPD (1)
- Operation Ajax (1)
- Operation TPAJAX (1)
- oversight (1)
- Phillipines (1)
- Pine Gap (1)
- politicization of intelligence (1)
- Prism (3)
- privacy (6)
- rendition (2)
- secrecy (6)
- security clearance (2)
- SIGINT (12)
- Signals Intelligence (3)
- spying (2)
- Stellar Wind (1)
- surveillance (11)
- targeted killings (1)
- torture (3)
- undersea cables (1)
- undersea tappng (1)